@poppyhaze I'd never seen it visualized before. Kind of amazing that they looked at this and noone thought, "so weird that they never shoot the engines or cockpit"

@poppyhaze Good rule. I'm not even a data scientist and I've learned this lesson. You can even work it out from intuition with prompting. For example, notice no bullet holes on the cockpit and engines? Why is that?

@poppyhaze That is an incredibly helpful image description!

@poppyhaze oh no, that plane has chicken pox

@poppyhaze fucked up they did antivax on a plane :/

@poppyhaze yo this plane got measles what the shit

@poppyhaze if you have a "Big Data person", get rid of them

@poppyhaze They probably should've added some red dots to the cockpit and engines just for good measure.

@poppyhaze @Nervengift but that song “Dangerous” is 🔥

@poppyhaze I'm not a Big Data person, so lemme guess...

The red dots are shotholes from many crashed and salvaged planes in WW2, marking the area where reinforcement for the remaining planes is advisable?

Or is it the other way round? Shotholes from many planes that did not crash, so the red dots mark the area where reinforcement is NOT needed, because the plane survived despite taking a shot?

@poppyhaze that plane has chickenpox

@poppyhaze Ah, the classic diagram of all the places a plane can get shot and still land safely.

@poppyhaze THX for the great explanation

@poppyhaze Reminds me of the sort of replies I get to making bug reports: Claiming the problem can't exist as I'm the only one reporting it.

@poppyhaze Would't getting rid of them be de-selection bias?

@poppyhaze This plane got the measles

@poppyhaze Suddenly I feel like a little data person. 😩

@poppyhaze Don't put armor where the bullet holes are.